Skip to main content

Morning Logic with Rob

Last night on the O’Reilly Factor, Bill O’Reilly aired a clip of an interview he conducted with Bill Maher. O’Reilly uttered something during that interview that I’ve heard numerous times over the years, repeated by a range of Republican politicians, and right-wing talking heads. The statement goes something like this: "We have not been attacked since September 11, 2001, so the Bush administration is doing a good job of keeping the country safe." In response to O’Reilly, Bill Maher described that statement is a logical fallacy.

There is a phrase in Latin that goes like this "cum hoc, ergo propter hoc" and means “with this, therefore because of this”. In other words, if x and y are occurring simultaneously, x must be the cause of y. Let’s take a more practical example, with some imagery to make things interesting. Right now, I’m looking out my window and observing the following:
"There is a breeze and children are playing. Therefore, the breeze causes children to play."
Sounds a little silly, doesn’t it? The children may have been lured outside to play because of the breeze, but their parents may have sent them outside, or they may have a new toy they want to try out. Now, let’s take our statement about the Bush Administration and reword it (note the meaning does not change):
"The Bush Administration is taking anti-terrorism measures, and we have not been attacked since 9/11, so these measures must be the reason for the lack of attacks."
It would appear that Bill Maher was correct. To conclude that the Bush Administration’s implementation of anti-terror policies is the reason we haven’t been attacked in over five years is a logical fallacy. It might be true that we haven’t been attacked since 9/11 because of the policies of the Administration, but it would be unwise, dangerous, and irresponsible to conclude that it is a certainty.


  1. Excellent, Robert. I applaud your analysis. It reminds me of an example portraing the difference between causative factors and associative factors (same logic).
    It goes like this: Since it was determined [in a study]that 99% of the people who had colon cancer also used tolet paper, it follows that the use of toilet paper causes colon cancer. (confusing an associative factor with causative factor).


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Unmasking My Mask Problem

I like to think of myself as a caring person, and attempt to behave compassionately towards others. Sometimes I fall short in that effort, but failing is what humans do, and successful humans learn from failure. I'd like to discuss what I believe is one of my more recent failures, and what I've come to learn about what's behind it. When the masking guidance and mandates first dropped, it short-circuited me. I reacted in disbelief, anger, and refusal to enter places that required masks. Masking was a simple act that was both scientifically and morally justified. I wondered if I really was a decent person, or if this reflexive pushback was just uncovering undiagnosed sociopathic tendencies. I started to wonder if my outward behaviors of positivity and kindness were just facades that I'd constructed around a dark psyche. Given the rhetoric surrounding mask-wearing, which can — as far as I understand — be reduced to “you're a monster if you don't do this,” it was ha


At the end of 2019, I began casually practicing mindfulness meditation. Just over a year later, it's become a nearly essential part of my routine; it provides me an off-ramp to ease back into my personal life after an eight-hour (often longer) workday. Some folks have expressed interest in hearing more about this routine, so I thought it would be helpful to chronicle my experiences: the good, the bad, and the frustrating. Buddhism has been an interest of mine for several years now, and I have a particular affinity for the simplicity of Zen Buddhism. It strips away a lot of the religious/spiritual elements more common in forms of Buddhism found in Tibet, for example. I sometimes use the term Zen meditation , when it is probably more accurate to refer to it as mindfulness meditation. This type of meditation focuses on being aware and present for each passing moment. Contrary to popular belief, it's not about emptying the mind or teleporting to some sort of astral plane. It's


The criminals who invaded the capital on January 6th, 2021 are not patriots. There is nothing noble or heroic about violently storming the capitol building and disrupting a legal proceeding that is outlined in the constitution of the United States . Those who took part in — or even endorsed — such actions are seditious goons with an axe to grind because the election results didn't favor them. The events yesterday were a culmination of unhinged ramblings and lies from the occupant of the White House, and years of disinformation emanating from the dark recesses of the web. Finally, there is simply no room for whataboutism here. The events of the summer do not hold a candle to the actual sedition that we witnessed yesterday. The demonstrations — and yes, violence — from this summer were to protest hundreds of years of oppression and marginalization of Black people. To equate those protests to yesterday's domestic terrorism is fallacious and ignorant.