Skip to main content

Rob attempts to disprove an old adage, and gets a craving for cake

Guess what, kids? You can have your cake and eat it, too. From the time I was a child, I never believed that old adage. I frequently had cake and ate it, and still do, though not quite as frequently.

The adage I'm talking about is evidently widely misunderstood, due to its poor wording. Let's take a look at it this proverb in a little more detail:

"You can't have your cake and eat it too"

As the proverb states, you have in your possession a cake. Logically and linguistically, you can eat this very cake of which you are in possession. In fact, if you are eating cake, then you must already possess it.

Some argue that in order to understand the proverb better, the words "eat" and "have" should be interchanged. Changing the order of the words doesn't help, because, as worded, it still implies possession and consumption cannot occur simultaneously, which is simply not true.

Perhaps the word "have" is to be interpreted as already having had eaten something, which is admittedly valid. However, it leaves too much room open for interpretation, and we should use the present perfect tense "have had", or use an entirely different verb, like "finish":

  1. You can't have had your cake and eat it too.
  2. You can't finish your cake and eat it too.

Even here, though, the first example is probably a better way to go. You can be in a state of finishing cake (i.e. eating your last few bites), but still have possession of it.

So, boys and girls, the next time someone tells you that you can't have your cake and eat it too, tell them that they're wrong and that the proverb, as worded, is a logical fallacy. Get yourself a piece of cake. Point out to your well-meaning mentor that you clearly have cake. Next, begin eating it, thereby demonstrating that possession and consumption of cake can happen simultaneously. Upon completing your cake, suggest to them an alternative way of wording the proverb, perhaps building on the examples provided above.

I am suddenly hungry for cheesecake. I may need to head out to the store, so I can have some (and eat it).


  1. i agree that the saying is ambiguous, besides being dopey; however i take it to mean "you can't eat your cake and expect to still have it". [Once one has ingested the cake it no longer exists in the state or form of a cake as we know it; therefore the eater of the cake no longer posesses the cake]

  2. Well, in that case, anyone who eats their cake and still expects to have it needs more help than an old proverb could possibly provide :-)

    I think I was just trying to point out that the saying, as worded, is not logical, and easily disproven. As usual, I probably could have been a little more clear about that.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Unmasking My Mask Problem

I like to think of myself as a caring person, and attempt to behave compassionately towards others. Sometimes I fall short in that effort, but failing is what humans do, and successful humans learn from failure. I'd like to discuss what I believe is one of my more recent failures, and what I've come to learn about what's behind it. When the masking guidance and mandates first dropped, it short-circuited me. I reacted in disbelief, anger, and refusal to enter places that required masks. Masking was a simple act that was both scientifically and morally justified. I wondered if I really was a decent person, or if this reflexive pushback was just uncovering undiagnosed sociopathic tendencies. I started to wonder if my outward behaviors of positivity and kindness were just facades that I'd constructed around a dark psyche. Given the rhetoric surrounding mask-wearing, which can — as far as I understand — be reduced to “you're a monster if you don't do this,” it was ha


At the end of 2019, I began casually practicing mindfulness meditation. Just over a year later, it's become a nearly essential part of my routine; it provides me an off-ramp to ease back into my personal life after an eight-hour (often longer) workday. Some folks have expressed interest in hearing more about this routine, so I thought it would be helpful to chronicle my experiences: the good, the bad, and the frustrating. Buddhism has been an interest of mine for several years now, and I have a particular affinity for the simplicity of Zen Buddhism. It strips away a lot of the religious/spiritual elements more common in forms of Buddhism found in Tibet, for example. I sometimes use the term Zen meditation , when it is probably more accurate to refer to it as mindfulness meditation. This type of meditation focuses on being aware and present for each passing moment. Contrary to popular belief, it's not about emptying the mind or teleporting to some sort of astral plane. It's


The criminals who invaded the capital on January 6th, 2021 are not patriots. There is nothing noble or heroic about violently storming the capitol building and disrupting a legal proceeding that is outlined in the constitution of the United States . Those who took part in — or even endorsed — such actions are seditious goons with an axe to grind because the election results didn't favor them. The events yesterday were a culmination of unhinged ramblings and lies from the occupant of the White House, and years of disinformation emanating from the dark recesses of the web. Finally, there is simply no room for whataboutism here. The events of the summer do not hold a candle to the actual sedition that we witnessed yesterday. The demonstrations — and yes, violence — from this summer were to protest hundreds of years of oppression and marginalization of Black people. To equate those protests to yesterday's domestic terrorism is fallacious and ignorant.